ORIGINAL ARTICLE
ANXIETY OF STUDENTS IN A DENTISTRY COURSE IN THE FACE OF SOCIAL ISOLATION
ANSIEDAD DE ESTUDIANTES DE CURSO DE ODONTOLOGÍA ANTE EL AISLAMIENTO SOCIAL
ANSIEDADE DE ALUNOS DE UM CURSO DE ODONTOLOGIA FRENTE AO ISOLAMENTO SOCIAL
https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2025-v.99-n.Ed.Esp-art.2467
Pamela Barbosa dos Santos¹
Gabriela Almeida Souza Leão Simonton²
Lorrayne Cesario Maria³
Luciana Faria Sanglard4
Maria Helena Monteiro de Barros Miotto5
¹Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas. Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Brazil FOP-UNICAMP. ORCID: 0000-0002-4155-7441.
²Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Brazil ORCID: 0000-0002-5405-3402
³Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Brazil ORCID: 0000-0002-9150-6159
4Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Brazil ORCID: 0000-0002-2520-7062
5Departamento de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Odontológicas. Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Brazil ORCID: 0000-0002-3227-7608
Corresponding author
Pamela Barbosa dos Santos
Departamento de Clínica Odontológica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas-SP - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, FOP-UNICAMP, Av. Limeira, 901, Bairro Areão – Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. CEP 13414-018. fone: +55(19) 2106-5294 – E-mail: pamela.es@hotmail.com.br
Submission: 12-01-2025
Approval: 07-03-2025
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic was a public health emergency and caused psychological
consequences, especially for students in the health field, as they could have
direct contact with infected patients during their clinical practice. Objective:
To analyze the anxiety levels of dental students during the COVID-19 pandemic
and their repercussions. Materials and methods: This cross-sectional
study was conducted with students from the Federal University of Espírito Santo
(n=170). Data collection was performed through two online questionnaires: one
involving sociodemographic, biosafety, and COVID-19-related aspects, and the
Beck Anxiety Inventory. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square
test (significance level of 5%). Results: Predominant anxiety levels
ranged from moderate (45.9%) to severe (40%). Significant correlations were
observed among single students (88.1%) and those in the 6th to 10th semesters
(82.8%). Those who knew individuals who died from COVID-19 showed moderate to
severe anxiety levels (90.1%). Conclusion: The majority of students
exhibited moderate to severe levels of anxiety, including symptoms such as
fear, insecurity, and restlessness.
Keywords: Anxiety; COVID-19; Students; Pandemic.
RESUMEN
La pandemia de COVID-19 fue una emergencia de salud pública y generó
consecuencias psicológicas, especialmente para los estudiantes del área de la
salud, ya que podrían tener contacto directo con pacientes infectados durante
sus prácticas clínicas. Objetivo: Analizar los niveles de ansiedad de
los estudiantes de odontología durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y sus
repercusiones. Materiales y métodos: Este estudio transversal se realizó
con estudiantes de la Universidad Federal de Espírito Santo (n=170). La
recopilación de datos se llevó a cabo mediante dos cuestionarios en línea: uno
abarcaba aspectos sociodemográficos, de bioseguridad y cuestiones relacionadas
con la COVID-19, y el Inventario de Ansiedad de Beck. El análisis estadístico
se realizó mediante la prueba de Chi-cuadrado (nivel de significancia del 5%). Resultados:
Los niveles predominantes de ansiedad variaron de moderado (45.9%) a grave
(40%). Se observaron correlaciones significativas entre los estudiantes
solteros (88.1%) y aquellos que cursaban entre el 6.º y el 10.º semestre
(82.8%). Aquellos que conocían a personas que fallecieron debido a la COVID-19
presentaron niveles de ansiedad de moderado a grave (90.1%). Conclusión:
La mayoría de los estudiantes presentaron niveles de ansiedad de moderado a
grave, con síntomas como miedo, inseguridad e inquietud.
Palabras clave: Ansiedad; COVID-19; Estudiantes; Pandemia.
RESUMO
A pandemia de COVID-19 representou uma emergência de saúde pública que gerou consequências psicológicas graves, especialmente entre estudantes da área da saúde, devido ao risco potencial de contato direto com pacientes infectados durante suas práticas clínicas. Objetivo: Analisar os níveis de ansiedade de estudantes de um curso de Odontologia durante a pandemia de COVID-19 e suas repercussões. Materiais e métodos: Este estudo transversal foi realizado com estudantes da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (n=170). A coleta de dados foi feita por meio de dois questionários aplicados online: um abordando aspectos sociodemográficos, de biossegurança e questões relacionadas à COVID-19, e outro utilizando o Inventário de Ansiedade de Beck. A análise estatística foi realizada por meio do teste Qui-quadrado, considerando um nível de significância de 5%. Resultados: Os níveis predominantes de ansiedade variaram de moderado (45,9%) a grave (40%). Foram observadas correlações entre níveis de ansiedade e alunos solteiros (88,1%) e aqueles matriculados entre o 6º e o 10º período (82,8%). Além disso, estudantes que conheceram indivíduos que faleceram em decorrência da COVID-19 apresentaram maior prevalência de ansiedade moderada a grave (90,1%). Conclusão: A maioria dos estudantes apresentou níveis moderados a graves de ansiedade, manifestando sintomas como medo, insegurança e inquietação.
Palavras-chave: Ansiedade; Covid-19; Estudantes; Pandemia.
INTRODUCTION
At the end of 2019, the SARS-COV-2 virus spread rapidly and infected the population worldwide, originating on the Asian continent (1). The COVID-19 pandemic has been a public health emergency, due to the high virulence, infectivity and transmission mechanisms of the virus, a factor that has generated major anxiety disorders among health professionals (2). Among them, dental surgeons are exposed to a high risk of contamination through the production of aerosols generated during the procedures they carry out on a daily basis, through the use of handpieces, ultrasonic devices and triple syringes, exposing them to droplets of saliva and blood (3). For this reason, dentistry was considered to be one of the professions most at risk of infection during the pandemic (4).
Faced with exposure to the virus, professionals began to live with the fear of possible infection, as well as of contaminating other people in their daily lives (5). When the pandemic was declared, social distancing measures and the use of masks were adopted in order to reduce the number of people infected and the mortality rate (6). The Covid-19 virus has the ability to survive for up to 72 hours once it has settled on surfaces such as plastic and stainless steel (7). The symptoms caused by the coronavirus involve a dry cough, shortness of breath, sore throat and headaches, nasal congestion and rhinitis (8). Dental teaching at public universities has been suspended for a long time, due to the impossibility of replacing face-to-face practical classes with remote teaching. As a result, returning to classes and face-to-face clinical practice has become a major challenge, considering the well-being of students, teachers, patients and families (9-10).
Under normal conditions, dental students already experience higher levels of stress than the general population during their training, due to the high demands of clinical practice (11). During the pandemic, the lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), the increase in the number of deaths and generalized uncertainty intensified the psychological impact on students (12-13). In addition, the absence of student activities, the delay in completing the course and long periods of lockdown gave rise to moments of uncertainty in the students (14). In view of the above, the aim of this study was to assess anxiety levels among dental students at a public university in the Southeast region of Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS
The study was submitted to and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES) - CAAE No. 31779120.1.0000.5060. All participants had access to and electronically signed the Informed Consent Form (ICF), which was sent along with the questionnaire. This document explained the purpose of the study, its advantages and benefits, as well as guaranteeing the confidentiality of any personal information.
For the sample calculation, an expected prevalence of (50%) was used, with a margin of error of (5%) and a confidence interval of (95%), in order to maximize the sample. The estimated population consisted of approximately 300 students enrolled at the time of data collection, and the final sample comprised 170 students distributed between the third and tenth periods of the course.
This is a descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study carried out in August 2020. Data was collected using two questionnaires applied via the Google Forms platform®, and distributed by e-mail and Whatsapp®. The inclusion criterion for taking part in the survey was being regularly enrolled in the Dentistry course. Those on sick leave, who did not answer the questionnaires in full or who were in their first two terms were excluded, as these students had no experience of clinical activities.
The first questionnaire covered sociodemographic aspects, considering independent variables such as age, gender, race/color, marital status, academic period, place of residence, biosafety and questions related to COVID-19. The second instrument used was the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), validated for Portuguese and widely used in different populations, including academics. Its aim was to assess the degree of anxiety (15-16). The BAI consists of 21 self-report questions, the answers to which are organized on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (absolutely nothing), 1 (slightly), 2 (moderately) and 3 (severely). The total score, with a maximum of 63 points, allows anxiety levels to be classified into four categories: minimal (0 to 7 points), mild (8 to 15 points), moderate (16 to 25 points) and severe (26 to 63 points).
A descriptive analysis of the data was carried out using frequency tables with numbers and percentages for each of the items in the survey instruments. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables was assessed using the Chi-square test. The significance level adopted was 5%. The IBM SPSS 20 statistical package was used for this analysis.
RESULTS
A total of 170 students answered the questionnaires (56.6%). The majority of students were female (81.2%), 93.5% were single, (97.6%) had no children, (46.5%) lived in Vitória and 30% lived with four people (Table I).
Table I - Demographic data of the research participants.
Features |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
Sex |
|
|
Female |
138 |
81,2 |
Male |
32 |
18,8 |
Marital status |
|
|
Single |
159 |
93,5 |
Married/stable union |
11 |
6,5 |
She has children |
|
|
Yes |
4 |
2,4 |
No |
166 |
97,6 |
People in the house |
|
|
One |
13 |
7,6 |
Two |
33 |
19,4 |
Three |
50 |
29,4 |
Four |
51 |
30,0 |
Five |
21 |
12,4 |
Six |
2 |
1,2 |
City of residence |
|
|
Cariacica |
14 |
8,2 |
Serra |
21 |
12,4 |
Vila Velha |
23 |
13,5 |
Victoria |
79 |
46,5 |
Other |
33 |
19,4 |
The subjects reported as causing the most anxiety were anatomy (45.9%) and surgery (31.2%). Most of the students were studying between the seventh and tenth terms (59.4%), and (47.1%) were in clinical activities. When asked about returning to classes, (51.2%) said that they would be able to afford all the PPE and (69.4%) believed that the university would not be able to provide students with safety items. Furthermore, (58.2%) said they had received training on the correct use of PPE (Table II).
Table II - Academic and biosafety data of the research participants.
Features |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
Course period |
|
|
3 - 4 |
26 |
15,3 |
5 - 6 |
43 |
25,3 |
7 - 8 |
57 |
33,5 |
9 - 10 |
44 |
25,9 |
Weekly hours of clinical care |
|
|
Up to 4 |
12 |
7,1 |
5 - 8 |
20 |
11,8 |
9 - 12 |
21 |
12,4 |
13 - 16 |
16 |
9,4 |
17 - 20 |
6 |
3,5 |
More than 20 |
5 |
2,9 |
I don't |
90 |
52,9 |
Can afford to buy all the PPE |
|
|
Yes |
87 |
51,2 |
No |
42 |
24,7 |
Doesn't know |
41 |
24,1 |
The PPE you offer is sufficient |
|
|
Yes |
22 |
12,9 |
No |
118 |
69,4 |
Don't know |
30 |
17,6 |
Received training to use PPE |
|
|
Yes |
99 |
58,2 |
No |
68 |
40,0 |
Don't know |
3 |
1,8 |
Subjects that cause the most anxiety |
|
|
Anatomy |
78 |
45,9 |
Surgery |
53 |
31,2 |
Pathology |
19 |
11,2 |
Aggression |
13 |
7,6 |
Undergraduate Thesis |
10 |
5,9 |
Orthodontics |
9 |
5,3 |
Histology |
8 |
4,7 |
Pediatric Dentistry |
8 |
4,7 |
Radiology |
7 |
4,1 |
Endodontics |
7 |
4,1 |
Biochemistry |
6 |
3,5 |
Sculpture |
6 |
3,5 |
Dentistry |
4 |
2,4 |
Trauma |
4 |
2,4 |
Restorative Dentistry |
3 |
1,8 |
Prosthesis |
3 |
1,8 |
Other |
6 |
3,5 |
None |
24 |
14,1 |
Most of the students were not affected by the disease (92.9%), but had friends and family members who fell ill and died (74.1% and 47.6%, respectively) (Table III).
Table III - COVID-19 data of survey participants.
Features |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
There was COVID-19 |
|
|
Yes |
12 |
7,1 |
No |
158 |
92,9 |
Do you know anyone who has fallen ill with COVID-19? |
|
|
Yes, family/friends |
126 |
74,1 |
Yes, others |
42 |
24,7 |
No |
2 |
1,2 |
Do you know anyone who died of COVID-19? |
|
|
Yes, family/friends |
81 |
47,6 |
Yes, others |
40 |
23,5 |
No |
49 |
28,9 |
After analyzing the anxiety questionnaire, we found that the following aspects predominated as never self-perceived: numbness or tingling (74.1%), dizziness or vertigo (61.8), trembling hands (65.9%) and fainting (97.1%). For the moderate classification, the majority reported restless legs (34.7%), difficulty relaxing (38.8%), nervousness or apprehension and tiredness (34.1%), as well as fear of losing control (31.2%). Finally, for the severe level, (42.9%) reported insecurity or indecision and (36.5%) fear of the worst happening. Table IV shows this data.
Table IV - Percentage distribution of data on anxiety.
Features |
Never |
Lightweight |
Moderate |
Grave |
Numbness or tingling |
74,1 |
16,5 |
9,4 |
0,0 |
Sensation of heat |
40,0 |
28,8 |
21,8 |
9,4 |
Restless legs |
18,8 |
18,8 |
34,7 |
27,6 |
Difficulty relaxing |
7,6 |
21,8 |
38,8 |
31,8 |
Fear of the worst happening |
10,6 |
21,8 |
31,2 |
36,5 |
Dizziness or vertigo |
61,8 |
21,2 |
6,5 |
10,6 |
Chest pain or palpitation |
51,2 |
26,5 |
13,5 |
8,8 |
Insecure or indecisive |
3,5 |
24,7 |
28,8 |
42,9 |
Frightened |
20,6 |
28,8 |
27,6 |
22,9 |
Nervous or apprehensive |
10,6 |
21,8 |
34,1 |
33,5 |
Choking sensation or "lump in the throat" |
61,2 |
18,2 |
14,1 |
6,5 |
Trembling hands |
65,9 |
11,2 |
18,2 |
4,7 |
Tiredness |
17,1 |
21,8 |
34,1 |
27,1 |
Fear of losing control |
22,9 |
18,8 |
31,2 |
27,1 |
Difficulty breathing |
60,6 |
23,5 |
8,8 |
7,1 |
Fear of dying |
55,3 |
16,5 |
11,2 |
17,1 |
Scared |
24,7 |
41,8 |
19,4 |
14,1 |
Indigestion or intestinal upset |
51,2 |
21,8 |
17,6 |
9,4 |
Fainting |
97,1 |
1,8 |
1,2 |
0,0 |
Facial flushing or sensation of heat |
58,8 |
24,1 |
11,2 |
5,9 |
Sweating (not due to heat) |
53,5 |
26,5 |
15,3 |
4,7 |
The BAI questionnaire was used to determine the students' anxiety levels. The majority fell into the moderate and severe levels (45.9% and 40% respectively) (Table V).
Table V - Anxiety level of survey participants.
Level |
Number |
Percentage (%) |
Minimum |
9 |
5,3 |
Lightweight |
15 |
8,8 |
Moderate |
78 |
45,9 |
Grave |
68 |
40,0 |
In Table VI, when the correlation between anxiety levels and sociodemographic aspects was carried out, we observed a positive relationship between single marital status and moderate/severe levels (p=0.010).
Table VI - Relationship between sociodemographic data and level of anxiety.
Features |
Minimum/Light |
Moderate/Severe |
p-value |
||
N |
% |
N |
% |
||
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
17 |
12,3 |
121 |
87,7 |
0,133 |
Male |
7 |
21,9 |
25 |
78,1 |
|
Marital status |
|
|
|
|
|
Single |
19 |
11,9 |
140 |
88,1 |
0,010 |
Married/stable union |
5 |
45,5 |
6 |
54,5 |
|
Children |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
0 |
0,0 |
4 |
100,0 |
0,541 |
No |
24 |
14,5 |
142 |
85,5 |
|
Lives alone |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
1 |
7,7 |
12 |
92,3 |
0,425 |
No |
23 |
14,6 |
134 |
85,4 |
The association between academic data, biosafety and level of anxiety showed that students between the sixth and tenth periods had moderate/severe anxiety (p=0.048) (Table VII).
Table VII - Relationship between academic data, biosafety and level of anxiety.
Features |
Minimal/Light |
Moderate/Severe |
p-value |
||
N |
% |
N |
% |
|
|
Course period |
|
|
|
|
|
3 - 5 |
3 |
6,2 |
45 |
93,8 |
0,048 |
6 - 10 |
21 |
17,2 |
101 |
82,8 |
|
Clinical care |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
11 |
13,8 |
69 |
86,3 |
0,537 |
No |
13 |
14,4 |
77 |
85,6 |
|
Conditions to buy PPE |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
11 |
12,6 |
76 |
87,4 |
0,365 |
No/don't know |
13 |
15,7 |
70 |
84,3 |
|
PPE provided is sufficient |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
4 |
18,2 |
18 |
81,8 |
0,377 |
No/don't know |
20 |
13,5 |
128 |
86,5 |
|
Received training to use PPE |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
17 |
17,2 |
82 |
82,8 |
0,129 |
No/don't know |
7 |
9,9 |
64 |
90,1 |
Finally, there was a positive association between students who knew someone who died from COVID-19 and moderate/severe anxiety (p=0.015) (Table VIII).
Table VIII - Relationship between COVID-19 and level of anxiety.
Features |
Minimum/Light |
Moderate/Severe |
p-value |
||
N |
% |
N |
% |
||
He was diagnosed with COVID-19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
3 |
25,0 |
9 |
75,0 |
0,230 |
No |
21 |
13,3 |
137 |
86,7 |
|
Do you know anyone who has fallen ill with COVID-19? |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
23 |
13,7 |
145 |
86,3 |
0,263 |
No |
1 |
50,0 |
1 |
50,0 |
|
Do you know anyone who died of COVID-19? |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
12 |
9,9 |
109 |
90,1 |
0,015 |
No |
12 |
24,5 |
37 |
75,5 |
DISCUSSION
Most of the participants in this study had moderate and severe levels of anxiety, (45.9%) and (40%) respectively. Associated with this result, the most prevalent symptoms were restless legs, difficulty relaxing, nervousness or apprehension, tiredness, insecurity or indecision and fear of the worst happening. In fact, the impact of the pandemic on the mental health of university students has been a recurring finding in other studies (11,9,17,18,19).
Corroborating this work, in India, a similar study also carried out during the pandemic period found that university students suffered psychological impact, with the highest percentage associated with depression, anxiety and stress (19). Similar results were found in other studies (9) and in a survey teachers at the Federal University of Espírito Santo itself, in which a portion of the participants had moderate levels of anxiety (20).
It is possible that one of the reasons for this is related to the long period of social isolation, which may have contributed to an increase in the perception of anxiety symptoms (21). In addition, the many sudden changes in routine, the fear of falling ill, frustration at the delay in training and uncertainty about returning to the course, controversial information, financial losses and stigma may also have had an impact on students' mental health (20,22).
Other relevant findings were the significant association of anxiety levels with single marital status and final periods of undergraduate studies. Similarly, the predominance of students at the Federal University of Santa Catarina was single (94%), in a study on the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic (23).
A probable justification for the association with the last periods of undergraduate studies is the fact that these participants would face a greater clinical workload in the semester they would be attending, thus increasing contact with the aerosols produced in the dental environment and possible risks of viral contamination (9,10).
With regard to the data obtained on biosafety, around (58.2%) of the students reported that they had received training in the use of personal protective equipment (PPE), since they were also in the final periods of the course and had completed the subjects that dealt with the subject. The students in Ataş & Talo Yildirim's survey (2020) also answered correctly about standard measures to protect themselves against COVID-19 (5). Even so, it is always necessary to reinforce protocols and attitudes, given the high risk of infection and transmission of the coronavirus in clinical dental practice(10,24).
In the present study and that of Almeida et al. (2020), there was a significant association between students with moderate and severe levels of anxiety and those who knew individuals who died from Covid-19. Similar results were found in relation to teachers. A possible explanation for this outcome was linked to partial ignorance of the virus and its impacts at the time the research was carried out. Insecurity and the risk of death were factors capable of interfering with anxiety levels(20).
The study's limitation is related to the fact that the research was carried out in a specific context, which is a public university. This may limit the generalizability of the method to other institutions, if they are private. Further research should be done the emotional consequences for students after the pandemic. However, this study provides important information on anxiety and its implications in various areas related to dental students, allowing for the development of support strategies and psychological interventions.
Educational institutions need to implement appropriate support measures for the challenges posed by the pandemic context. These measures include actions to reduce the fear of contamination. In addition, it is essential to promote the emotional care of students, ensuring the provision of psychological assistance to students during critical periods (11,5,23). As was the case at UFES, given the pandemic context and high levels of anxiety, psychological care was offered to students. With regard to teaching, universities should look for ways to also provide remote modality, when necessary, taking into account the advances of technology in the educational field.
It can be concluded that most of the students on the dentistry course at the Federal University of Espírito Santo had moderate to severe levels of anxiety during the Covid-19 pandemic, especially those who were at later stages of the course or those who knew someone who died from the disease, thus having physical and emotional consequences.
REFERENCES
1. Trindade GG, Caxito SMC, Xavier AREO, Xavier MAS, Brandão F. COVID-19: therapeutic approaches description and discussion. Acad Bras Cienc. 2020;92 :e20200466. doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020200466.
2. Schuch HS, Cademartori MG, Dias VD, Levandowski ML, Munhoz TN, Hallal PC, et al. Depression and anxiety among the University community during the Covid-19 pandemic: a study in Southern Brazil. Acad Bras Cienc. 2023;95:e20220100. doi:10.1590/0001-3765202320220100.
3. Para KKW, Tsang OTY, Leung WS, Tam AR, Wu TC, Lung DC, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:565–574. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1.
4. Singh G, Priya H, Mishra D, Kumar H, Monga N, Kumari K. Oral manifestations and dental practice recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10:1605. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1605_20.
5. Atas O, Talo Yildirim T. Evaluation of knowledge, attitudes, and clinical education of dental students about COVID-19 pandemic. PeerJ. 2020;8 :e9575 . doi:10.7717/peerj.9575.
6. Rusyan E, Mielczarek A, Boguslawska-Kapala A, Adamczyk K, Piec R, Szykula-Piec B. Level of Anxiety Caused by the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic among Dentists in Poland. Medicina. 2022;58:415. doi:10.3390/medicina58030415.
7. Singh R, Goel A, Pani P, Negi BS, Rajguru JP, Somayaj NS. Coronavirus: An emerging and future challenge for dental clinicians. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2022;13:58. doi:10.4103/njms.NJMS_58_20.
8. Amato A, Caggiano M, Amato M, Moccia G, Capunzo M, De Caro F. Infection Control in Dental Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:4769. doi:10.3390/ijerph17134769.
9. Almeida RZ, Casarin M, Freitas BO, Muniz FWMG. Medo e ansiedade de estudantes de Odontologia diante da pandemia do novo coronavírus: um estudo transversal. Arch health Invest. 2020;9:623–8. doi:10.21270/archi.v9i6.5243.
10. Budak L, Negovetic Vranic D, Vranic L. Assessment of dental students' knowledge of infection control and prevention during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Dent Educ. 2024;28:679–88. doi:10.1111/eje.12995.
11. Stormon N, Ford PJ, Kisely S, Bartle E, Eley DS. Depression, anxiety and stress in a cohort of Australian dentistry students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019;23:507–14. doi:10.1111/eje.12459.
12. Hossain MM, Sultana A, Purohit N. Mental health outcomes of quarantine and isolation for infection prevention: a systematic umbrella review of the global evidence. 2020;42:e2020038. doi:10.4178/epih.e2020038.
13. Steinberg N, Batistella EA, Iyer S, Madathil AS, Allison P, Brondani M, et al. The dental COVID-19 paradox: Disparity in behaviors inside and outside dental schools in Canada. J Dent Educ. 2024;1–9. doi:10.1002/jdd.13527.
14. Sahu P. Closure of Universities Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Impact on Education and Mental Health of Students and Academic Staff. Cureus. 2020;12:e7541. doi:10.7759/cureus.7541.
15. Beck AT, Epstein N, Brown G, Steer RA. Um inventário para medir ansiedade clínica: propriedades psicométricas. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56:893. doi:10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.893.
16. Julian LJ. Medidas de ansiedade: Inventário de Ansiedade Traço-Estado (STAI), Inventário de Ansiedade de Beck (BAI) e Escala Hospitalar de Ansiedade e Depressão-Ansiedade (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;11 :S467 –72. Doi
17. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, Ho RC. Respostas psicológicas imediatas e fatores associados durante o estágio inicial da epidemia da doença do coronavírus de 2019 (COVID-19) entre a população geral na China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1729. doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729.
18. Schuch HS, Cademartori MG, Dias VD, Levandowski ML, Munhoz TN, Hallal PC, et al. Depression and anxiety among the University community during the Covid. Acad Bras Cienc. 2023;95:e20220100 . doi:10.1590/0001-3765202320220100.
19. Singh S, Saxena T, Rahat A, Dwivedi D, Ahmad S, Tiwari K. Psychological Impact of Covid-19 on Dental Students' - An Interventional Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16 :S403 –5. doi:10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_631_23.
20. Velten DB, Thomes CR, Miotto MHMB. Presença de ansiedade em docentes universitários do curso de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo em tempos de pandemia. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2022;51 :e20220001. doi:10.1590/1807-2577.00122.
21. Poulsen MN, Bailey-Davi L, Pollak J, Hirsch AG, Schwartz BS. Household Food Insecurity and Home Food Availability in Relation to Youth Diet, Body Mass Index, and Adiposity. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119:1666–75. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.001.
22. Hill EB, Mastny-Jensen C, Loch C. Before and after: COVID-19 impacts on dental students' well-being, clinical competency and employment opportunities. Eur J Dent Educ. 2024;28:522–9. doi:10.1111/eje.12977.
23. Valesan LF, Salvador AC, Régis JR, Coan MV, Archer AB, Denardin ACS, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on College Students in Brazil. Acad Bras Cienc. 2024;96 :e20220441. doi:10.1590/0001-3765202420220441.
24. Aragão MGB, Gomes FIF, Pinho Maia Paixão-de-Melo L, Corona SAM. A survey on knowledge and perceptions. Eur J Dent Educ. 2020;26:93–105. doi:10.1111/eje.12676.
Funding and Acknowledgements:
Espírito Santo Research Support Foundation (FAPES).
Declaration of conflict of interest:
“Nothing to declare
Pamela Barbosa dos Santos: Contributed substantially to the conception and/or planning of the study; in obtaining, analyzing and/or interpreting the data; as well as in the writing and/or critical review and final approval of the published version.
Gabriela Almeida Souza Leão Simonton: Contributed substantially to the conception and/or planning of the study; in obtaining, analyzing and/or interpreting the data; as well as in the writing and/or critical review and final approval of the published version.
Lorrayne Cesario Maria: Contributed to the critical review and final approval of the published version.
Luciana Faria Sanglard: Contributed to the critical review and final approval of the published version.
Maria Helena Monteiro de Barros Miotto: Contributed substantially to the conception and/or planning of the study; in obtaining, analyzing and/or interpreting the data; as well as in the writing Digitally signed document as described in the Signature Protocol(s) contained in this file, from where it is possible to verify its authenticity and/or critical review and final approval of the published version.
Scientific Editor: Ítalo Arão Pereira Ribeiro. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0778-1447
Rev Enferm Atual In Derme 2025;99(Ed.Esp): e025050