EVIDÊNCIAS DA AUTOEFICÁCIA MATERNA NA ASSISTÊNCIA E ACOMPANHAMENTO PRÉ-NATAL: SCOPING REVIEW

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2023-v.97-n.2-art.1809

Palavras-chave:

Enfermagem, Autoeficácia, Pesquisa Quantitativa, Inventário de Autoeficácia no Parto

Resumo

Objetivo: mapear evidências de autoeficácia materna obtidas por meio do Childbirth Selfefcacy Inventory durante a assistência e acompanhamento pré-natal. Métodos: revisão de escopo, com estratégia de busca usando os termos “Pregnancy”, “Self-efficacy”, “Prenatal care”, nas bases de dados Medline, Scopus, Pubmed, Web of Science, Lilacs, Cinahl e na biblioteca Scielo. Os critérios de elegibilidade foram: estudos primários, texto completo, nos diferentes idomas. Utilizou-se para a análise crítica dos delineamentos experimentais, revisões e qualitativas, os critérios do Critical Appraisal Skills Programme e os checklists do Joanna Briggs Institute. Compuseram a amostra final 14 artigos, por atender a questão e os objetivos da pesquisa. Resultados: Notou-se na literatura publicações sobre a temática de 2007 a 2020, e em relação as características metodológicas foram encontrados estudos descritivos, ensaios clínicos randomizados controlados e ensaios clínicos sem randomização. Considerações finais: As principais evidências mostram que a autoeficácia no parto é um conceito importante no que se refere a preparação para o trabalho de parto e parto, e é uma avaliação benéfica das crenças das mulheres grávidas em sua capacidade de conduzir o parto.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

-Souza EL, Carvalho ALC, Pereira BF, Souza BG, Souza GR, Ardisson GMC, Almeida MJGG. Factor influencing the mode of delivery in Brazil. Rev Med (São Paulo) [Internet]. 2022 [Citado 2023 Mar 30];101(5):2-172947. Available from: https://www.revistas.usp.br/revistadc/article/view/172947/185973

- World Health Organization. Recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience [Internet]. Geneve: WHO; 2014. [cited 2023 Mar 30]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240045989

-Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Departamento de Gestão e Incorporação de Tecnologias em Saúde. Diretrizes nacionais de assistência ao parto normal: versão resumida [recurso eletrônico]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2017. [citado 2023 Mar 30]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/diretrizes_nacionais_assistencia_parto_normal.pdf

-Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. Am Psychol [Internet]. 1989[citado 2023 Mar 30]; 44(9):1175–84. Available from: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-01275-001

-Bernardo EBR. Tradução, adaptação transcultural e validação do Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory para uso no Brasil. [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade Federal do Ceará. Fortaleza; 2020 [citado 2023 Mar 20]. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufc.br/bitstream/riufc/55560/3/2020_tese_ebrbernardo.pdf

- Howarth AM, Swain NR. Skills-based childbirth preparation increases childbirth self-efficacy for first time mothers. Midwifery [Internet]. 2019[citado 2023 Mar 30]; 70:100-105. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613818303747?via%3Dihub

-Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: Scoping Reviews (2020 version). In: Aromataris E, Munn Z (Editors). JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI; 2020. Available from https://synthesismanual.jbi.global. doi: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-12

-Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, Mcinerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation [Internet]. 2015[citado 2023 Mar 14]; 13(3): 141-46. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/ijebh/Fulltext/2015/09000/Guidance_for_conducting_systematic_scoping_reviews.5.aspx

- Ercole FF, Melo LS, Alcoforado CLG. Revisão integrativa versus revisão sistemática. Rev Min Enferm [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2022 mar 22];18(1):12-14. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/ detalhes/904

- Juan BC por CASPe. Lectura crítica de la evidencia clínica. Barcelona: Elsevier; 2015

-Stillwell SB, Fineout-Overholt E, Melnyk BM, Williamson KM. Searching for the evidence strategies to help you conduct a successful search. Am J Nurs [Internet]. 2010 [citado 2022 Mar 22];110(5):41-47. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20520115

-Rwakarema M, Premji SS, Nyanza EC, Riziki P, Palacios-Derflinghe L. Antenatal depression is associated with pregnancy-related anxiety, partner relations, and wealth in women in Northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study. BMC Womens Health [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2022 Mar 22]. 15. Available from: https://bmcwomenshealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12905-015-0225-y

-Moffat MA, Bell JS, Porter MA, Lawton S, Hundley V, Danielian P, Bhattacharya S. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: A qualitative study. BJOG [Internet]. 2007 [citado 2022 Mar 22]114(1):86-93. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17233863/

- Munkhondya BMJ, Munkhondya TE, Chirwa E, Wang H. Efficacy of companion-integrated childbirth preparation for childbirth fear, self-efficacy, and maternal support in primigravid women in Malawi. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2022 Mar 17];20(1):48. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-019-2717-5

- Azimi M, Fahami F, Mohamadirizi S. The Relationship between Perceived Social Support in the First Pregnancy and Fear of Childbirth. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res [Internet]. 2018 [citado 2022 Mar 22].23:235-239. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5954647/

-Hailu D, Berhe H. Knowledge about Obstetric Danger Signs and Associated Factors among Mothers in Tsegedie District, Tigray Region, Ethiopia 2013: Community Based Cross-Sectional Study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2022 Mar 17]; 9(2): e83459. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3916287/pdf/pone.0083459.pdf

-Downe S, Finlayson K, Tunçalp Ӧ, Metin Gülmezoglu A. What matters to women: a systematic scoping review to identify the processes and outcomes of antenatal care provision that are important to healthy pregnant women. BJOG [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2022 Mar 17];123(4):529-39. Available from: https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13819

-Schwartz L, Toohill J, Creedy DK, Baird K, Gamble J, Fenwick J. Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy in Australian childbearing women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth [Internet]. 2015[citado 2022 Mar 17]. 15:29. Available from: https://bmcpregnancychildbirth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12884-015-0465-8

-Serçekuş P, Başkale H. Effects of antenatal education on fear of childbirth, maternal self-efficacy and parental attachment. Midwifery [Internet]. 2016 [citado 2022 Mar 17];34:166-172. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613815003228?via%3Dihub

- Abbasi P, Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi S, Mirghafourvand M. Comparing the effect of e-learning and educational booklet on the childbirth self-efficacy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2018[citado 2022 Mar 12];31(5):644-650. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14767058.2017.1293031?journalCode=ijmf20

-Carlsson IM, Ziegert K. The relationship between childbirth self-efficacy and aspects of well-being, birth interventions and birth outcomes. Midwifery [Internet]. 2015 [citado 2022 Mar 12];31(10):1000-1007. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613815001539?via%3Dihub

-Zhao Y, Wu J, Yang H, Yin X, Li D, Qiu L, Sun N, Gong Y. Factors associated with childbirth self-efficacy: a multicenter cross-sectional study in China. Midwifery [Internet]. 2021[citado 2022 Mar 12];93:102883. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613820302552?via%3Dihub

- SohYX, Razak NKBA, Cheng LJ, Lau Y. Determinants of childbirth self-efficacy among multi-ethnic pregnant women in Singapore: A structural equation modelling approach, Midwifery [Internet]. 2020 [citado 2022 Mar 12];87:102716. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266613820300899?via%3Dihub

-Vitek K, Ward LM. Risky, Dramatic, and Unrealistic: Reality Television Portrayals of Pregnancy and Childbirth and their Effects on Women’s Fear and Self- Efficacy. Health Communication [Internet]. 2018[citado 2022 Mar 08];1532- 7027. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10410236.2018.1481708?journalCode=hhth20

- Salomonsson B, Berterö C, Alehagen S. Self-efficacy in pregnant women with severe fear of childbirth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs [Internet]. 2013[citado 2022 Mar 08];42(2):191-202. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0884-2175(15)31268-5

-Santos ILS, Pimentel CE, Alves TP. Persuasion applications for health campaign optimization: a review. Psicol Estud [Internet]. 2022 [citado 2022 Mar 08];27: e48621. Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/pe/a/4tvDrGz6ncPM64vVGRdGfGG/

-Toohill J, Fenwick J, Gamble J, Creedy DK, Buist A, Turkstra E, Ryding EL. A randomized controlled trial of a psycho-education intervention by midwives in reducing childbirth fear in pregnant women. Birth [Internet]. 2014[citado 2022 Mar 08];41(4):384-94. Available from:

Publicado

04-06-2023

Como Citar

1.
Ferreira Filgueiras T, Anderson de Oliveira Cruz R, Ferreira Filgueiras T, Alves Silva R, Narciso AC, dos Santos Oliveira SH. EVIDÊNCIAS DA AUTOEFICÁCIA MATERNA NA ASSISTÊNCIA E ACOMPANHAMENTO PRÉ-NATAL: SCOPING REVIEW. Rev. Enferm. Atual In Derme [Internet]. 4º de junho de 2023 [citado 18º de dezembro de 2024];97(2):e023103. Disponível em: https://revistaenfermagematual.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1809

Edição

Seção

REVISÃO DE ESCOPO