O PARTO DOMICILIAR PLANEJADO
UMA REVISÃO DE ESCOPO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31011/reaid-2024-v.98-n.3-art.1906Palavras-chave:
Mulheres; Gravidez; Parto Domiciliar; Tocologia; Serviços de Saúde.Resumo
Objetivo: mapear os conceitos existentes em relação ao parto domiciliar planejado. Métodos: revisão de escopo realizada nas bases de dados em enfermagem: Medical Literature Analysisand Retrievel System Online, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature e The Scientific Electronic Library Online. Resultados: obteve 15 estudos sobre o parto domiciliar planejado, retratando o perfil de mulheres e os desfechos maternos e neonatais, os profissionais de saúde na assistência ao parir em casa, com foco na expertise e qualificação, e a escolha e vivência das mulheres no parto domiciliar. Pois, o direito à informação qualificada para tomada de decisão da mulher constitui um alicerce para a efetivação do parto domiciliar planejado. Conclusão: tornam-se necessárias as políticas públicas que garantam o acesso e direito das mulheres em parir em domicílio, com apoio de profissionais de saúde qualificados, com foco no respeito, com assistência individualizada e integral.
Downloads
Referências
Oliveira TR, Barbosa AF, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP, Dulfe PAM, Maciel VL. Assistance to planned home childbirth: professional trajectory and specificities of the obstetric nurse care. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2020;29:e20190182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2019-0182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2019-0182
Entringer AP, Gomes MASM, Costa ACC, Pinto M. Impacto orçamentário do parto vaginal espontâneo e da cesariana eletiva sem indicação clínica no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2018;42:e116. doi: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2018.116
Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan LMD, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1341-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30717-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7
Batista Filho M, Rissin A. WHO and the epidemic of cesarians. Rev Bras Saúde Mater Infant. 2018;18(1):5-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042018000100001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042018000100001
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2018 [cited 2021 abr 14]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf
Paula E, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP, Felício FC, Araújo RCB, Clamilco RASI, et al. Obstetric violence and the current obstetric model, in the perception of health managers. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2020;29:e20190248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265X-TCE-2019-0248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-265x-tce-2019-0248
Pinto KRTF, Zani AV, Bernardy CCF, Rossaneis MA, Rodrigues R, Parada CMGL. Factors associated with obstetric interventions in public maternity hospitals. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2020;20(4):1091-100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000400009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-93042020000400009
Martins CP, Luzio C. A. HumanizaSUS policy: anchoring a ship in space. Interface. 2017;21(60):13-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622015.0614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-57622015.0614
Santos Filho SB, Souza KV. Rede Cegonha network and the methodological challenges of implementing networks in the SUS. Cienc Saude Colet. 2021;26(3):775-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.21462020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232021263.21462020
Ministério da Saúde (BR). Cadernos HumanizaSUS. Volume 4: Humanização do parto e do nascimento. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
Cursino TP, Benincasa M. Parto domiciliar planejado no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática nacional. Cienc Saude Colet. 2020;25(4):1433-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.13582018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.13582018
Maimburg RD. Homebirth organised in a caseload midwifery model with affiliation to a danish university hospital - A descriptive study. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;16:82-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.02.011
Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Planned home versus planned hospital births in women at low-risk pregnancy: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2018;222:102-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.016
Tuck MLD, Wallace EM, Davey MA, Veitch V, Oats J. Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):357. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1996-6
Holten L, Hollander M, Miranda E. When the hospital is no longer an option: a multiple case study of defining moments for women choosing home birth in high-risk pregnancies in the Netherlands. Qual Health Res. 2018;12:1883-96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318791535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318791535
Ahl M, Lundgren I. Working with home birth - swedish midwives’ experiences. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2018;18:24-29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.08.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.08.006
Clancy A, Gjaerum RG. Home as a place for giving birth-a circumpolar study of the experiences of mothers and midwifes. Health Care Women Int. 2019;40(2):121-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2018.1531002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2018.1531002
Larios FL, Nuno-Aguilar C, Rocca-Ihenacho L, Castricardona F, Escuriet R. Challenging the status quo: Women's experiences of opting for a home birth in Andalucia, Spain. Midwifery. 2019;70:15-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.001
Scarf VL, Rossiter C, Vedam S, Dahlen HG, Ellwood D, Foster D, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes by planned place of birth among women with low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Midwifery. 2018;62:240-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.03.024
Reitsma A, Simioni J, Brunton G, Kaufman K, Hutton EK. Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: a systematic review and meta-analyses. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100319
Reis TLR, Padoin SMM, Toebe TFP, Paula CC, Quadros J. S. Women’s autonomy in the process of labour and childbirth: integrative literature review. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2017;38(1):e64677. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.01.64677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2017.01.64677
Koettker JG, Bruggemann OD, Knobel R. Maternal results from planned home births assisted by nurses from the hanami team in the south of Brazil, 2002-2012. Texto & Contexto Enferm. 2017;26(1):e3110015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017003110015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-07072017003110015
Koettker JG, Bruggemann OM, Freita PF, Riesco M G, Costa R. Obstetric practices in planned home births assisted in Brazil. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017034003371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2017034003371
Lessa HF, Tyrrell MAR, Alves VH, Rodrigues DP. Choosing the home planned childbirth: a natural and drug-free option. Rev Pesqui (Univ Fed Estado Rio J Online). 2018;10(4):1118-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2018.v10i4.1118-1122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9789/2175-5361.2018.v10i4.1118-1122
Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Munn Z, Tricco AC, Khalil, H. Chapter 11: scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z. JBI Manual for evidence synthesis. Adelaide: JBI; 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIRM-20-01
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. Prisma extension for scoping reviews (Prisma-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
Moura RS, Saraiva FJC, Santos MA, Santos AMRO, santos RM, Lima PAB. Perfil obstétrico e neonatal dos partos naturais domiciliares assistidos por enfermeiros obstetras. Cienc Enferm. 2019;25(13):1-13. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-95532019000100210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95532019000100210
Forster AD, Mckaya H, Davey M, Small R, Cullinane F, Newton M, et al. Women’s views and experiences of publicly-funded homebirth programs in Victoria, Australia: A cross-sectional survey. Women Birth. 2018;32(3):221-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2018.07.019
Skrondal TF, Gabrielsen BT, Aune I. All that I need exists within me: a qualitative study of nulliparous Norwegian women’s experiences with planned home birth. Midwifery. 2020;86:102705. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102705 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102705
Garrido PR, Morán JAP, Tricas JG. Exploring social and health care representations about home birth: an integrative literature review. Public Health Nurs. 2020;37(3):422-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.12724
Hunter J, Dixon K, Dahlen HG. The experiences of privately practising midwives in Australia who have been reported to the Australian health practitioner regulation agency: a qualitative study. Women and Birth. 2020;34(1):23-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.07.008
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
